[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#416576: installation-report: Successful installation on Dell Inspiron 5100



On Thursday 29 March 2007 03:23, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> The installer presented me with three possible network devices:
> firewire networking (eth0), ethernet (eth1), and wireless (eth2). 
> However, checking dmesg showed that the wireless card failed to load
> required firmware, so it likely wouldn't have worked if I tried it. 

The installer currently has no knowledge of firmware; this will be worked 
on for Lenny.

> Also, while the ability to install over firewire networking seems quite
> useful, many systems have firewire, and most users will not want to use
> it for the install; thus, if only firewire and one other network
> interface exist, the install should default to the other network
> interface without asking.

The installer does link detection, so it should probably have selected 
your wired NIC based on that. Would be nice to know if/why that did not 
work.

> In general, when I install with a netinst CD, I only want to install
> packages from the network after the initial install, so I had to go
> remove the CD from /etc/apt/sources.list .  Perhaps the question about
> using a network mirror could have three responses: "Use a network
> mirror only", "Use a network mirror in addition to the CD", and "Use
> the CD only"?

Known issue; on the todo list for Lenny.

> I made the mistake of allowing tasksel to install all standard
> packages.  This still installs far too much.  Some examples of things
> that should not have standard priority (along with bug numbers when
> filed; those should become blocking bugs after this installation report
> has a bug number):

The priority of packages is not a debian-installer issue. It is an issue 
that should be discussed on debian-devel and bugs should be filed 
primarily against the relevant packages and eventually against ftp.d.o.
As you already seem to have filed the relevant reports I don't see any 
further action necessary. IMO an installation report should not be used 
for tracking if these bugs have been solved as it is not a d-i issue.

Cheers,
FJP

Attachment: pgpgQHV3Qnrij.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: