Bug#394344: missing IDE modules
Op 30-01-2007 om 17:16 schreef Jacob L. Anawalt:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> >
> >It could indeed that IDE modules are not loaded for your hardware.
> >When switching to VT2 is possible for you in d-i,
> >then I suggest that you manual `modprobe IDE-modules`.
> >(And please provide feedback.)
> >
>
> Trying modprobe IDE-modules from VT2 before the hardware detection scan:
> FATAL: Module IDE_modules not found.
Because the is no IDE module with the name 'IDE-modules'
Valid names for IDE modules can found
in /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/
> lsmod shows that ide_core is the only ide_* module loaded at this point.
>
> Then I let hardware detection run. This loaded up ide_generic, ide_disk
> and ide_cd. IDE_modules is still not found, but I'm guessing you meant
> ide_* to get generic, disk and cd to load. I tried manually modprobing
> those modules, with little effect as they were already automatically
> loaded. If there is some module named IDE_modules, it does not exist on
> that installer in a location that `modprobe IDE-modules` would work.
My apology for my part in the confusion.
> This is the same installation CD I used in October. The help text before
> booting the installer (F1) says 20061019.
>
> I apologize for the large delay but the system I was testing on before
> was put into production and has not been able to be taken offline since.
> I have since purchased identical hardware for a backup of the system and
> am testing again.
No worries. A late response is still beter then NO response.
For the best results I suggest to use debian-installer with
the 2.6.18 kernel. It is about _now_ available.
> I am still of the opinion that all-generic-ide must be
> compiled in for this to work. I have not seen a post on the web to the
> contrary, instead I see more about work-arounds like sata cd-rom drives
> and USB installs.
[1]
Cheers
Geert Stappers
[1] I could not resist to write something like
I'm glad the hardware doesn't care about opinions,
it only obeys the program code.
Reply to: