Samuel Thibault wrote: > My point is that very _few_ people know that installing numlockx is just > sufficient for having numlock set at bootup, while I guess (maybe that's > only a guess, but neither of us can answer, only polling can) that most > people would prefer numlock set. Or rather: it's quite difficult for > those people that want it do discover that they should just install > numlockx, hence documentation. I still don't understand why most people will want to configure their computer to use something different from the bios default. If I want numlock on, I set it in the bios, then it's always on, even during early bootup. A program that turns it on when X starts feels strongly of hack to me. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature