Marco Amadori <marco.amadori@gmail.com> writes:
> The ubiquity approach could be surely be faster than d-i/g-i but I do not
> think we want to support a different way of installing debian besides than
> the official one.
Indeed. The d-i/g-i is far better and easier to maintain since it
won't differ too much from the "original" installer ;-)
The problematic thing that I see is it'll differ on the initial steps
of installation since you'll already have the kernel and kernel
modules loaded and it can require some modifications from d-i side to
support it well.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
_______________________________________________
Debian-live-devel mailing list
Debian-live-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-live-devel