[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#397068: marked as done (Re. Closed Bug#394766 (Usbstick preseeding error "Failed to retrieve the preconfiguration file") is not fixed)

Your message dated Mon, 8 Jan 2007 00:07:56 -0600
with message-id <200701080007.57876.adam@alphapapa.net>
and subject line Fwd: Re: Bug 397068: Close?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message --- Package: debian-installer
Version: 20061103

I can confirm that the above bug is not fixed in version 20061103 of images taken from http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/

I receive similar error messages to this user although I'm using the usb key as the storage point for the preseed.cfg file, location in directory /conf (NOT within the initrd.gz file).

This location is passed as an append attribute in the syslinux.cfg file (preseed/file=/hd-media/conf/preseed.cfg). I attach both the syslinux.cfg and preseed.cfg files.

The installation is on a Via EPIA MII 1200 pc using a Sandisk MiniCruzer key. Unfortunately, I cannot get easy access to the usb info but I'm willing to help test and proposed fixes.

Please advise.


Attachment: preseed.cfg.cnf
Description: Binary data

Attachment: syslinux.cfg
Description: Binary data

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Hi Adam,

Yes, that's fine by me.


On 31/12/06, Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net > wrote:
Hi Andrew,


Can this be closed?

Adam Porter

--- End Message ---

Attachment: pgpfhIxJ1744B.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: