[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: XXX marks in ro/*.po files point to unclear things in the manual



On Thursday 26 October 2006 23:03, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> using-d-i.po:# XXX: isn't it "DEC stations"?

No, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DECstation

> using-d-i.po:# XXX: 2.4 is no longer default! should this be abolished?

Done (together with other outdated references to 2.4).

> using-d-i.po:# XXX: „address is the bitwise” does not fit quite well

Hmm. I would not know how else to explain it, though I agree it is 
somewhat technical and detailed.

> using-d-i.po:# XXX: shouldn't real Note style be used instead of the
> inline string?

Done. It's probably important enough for that.

Attachment: pgpMaic_Nt9BJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: