Re: Bug#388159: missing lspci on a fresh install
I feel my previous email could be taken as harsh on my side, which it
was not menat to be at all. I apologize to the reporter if he feels this
way.
Sven Luther wrote:
> it was Frans who suggested this, and doing ping-pong of bug reporters
> is hardly user friendly
I am not doing ping pong of anything. This bug was incorrectly
assigned to the base pseudo-package, which I co-maintain with Dato, so
it is my duty to reassign it to where I think it belongs.
Of course I could be wrong and it might be reassigned again to a more
suited package and I see no problem with it.
> especially given the rather crude kind of response Guy and Rick are
> getting.
Despite whatever empathy I might feel or not about this issue, I don't
see how letting this bug rot in the wrong place can be more polite,
useful or fulfilling for the bug reporter.
Regards... and Happy and productive discussion/hacking to all involved!
(Please keep me out this loop)
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' : -- Emma Goldman
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
Reply to: