[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#388159: missing lspci on a fresh install

On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:25:21AM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> reassign 388159 installation-reports
> retitle 388159 installation-reports: Please depend on lspci 
> severity wishlist
> thanks

Hi Amaya, ...

> Rick Thomas wrote:
> > Package: base
> Please do not file bugs against the base pseudo-package.
> It is there just as a catch-all-I-dunno-where-to-file-this-report for
> users that can't really tell what package is giving them problems.
> All the bug reports here get reassigned to the right package.

it was Frans who suggested this, and doing ping-pong of bug reporters is
hardly user friendly, especially given the rather crude kind of response Guy
and Rick are getting.

> > Since the install-report template requests the output of lspci, I
> > would think you -- of all folks -- would want it as part of the base
> > system.
> Imho, installation-reports should depend on, or recommend lspci if it
> requires its output for the report.

Installation-reports is always installed, right ? or would there be need of
another bug report against another yet-to-be-determined package for inclusion
of lspci in either the base system or the server task ? 


Sven Luther

Reply to: