[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#375392: marked as done (Fallo en la instalación)



Your message dated Mon, 26 Jun 2006 07:27:51 +0200
with message-id <20060626052751.GR10237@djedefre.onera>
and subject line Bug#375392: Fallo en la instalación
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Descargado del sitio oficial de Debian el 19-06-2.006
Intento de instalación: 25-06-2.006
Machine: Clónico con Atlhon 64 bits 3700+
RaM 1024
Root Device: IDE
La instalación se ha de hacer en un disco duro dedicado todo a LINUX.
Initial boot worked: E





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> >>Package: installation-reports
> >>Debian-installer-version: Descargado del sitio oficial de Debian el 
> >>19-06-2.006
> >>Intento de instalación: 25-06-2.006
> >>Machine: Clónico con Atlhon 64 bits 3700+
> >>Ram 1024
> >>Root Device: IDE
> >>Installation in hard disk exclusive of LINUX.
> >>Initial boot worked: E
> >>    
> >
> >
> >What is the exact URL of the ISO image you used?
> >  
> >http://ftp.gva.es/mirror/debian-cd/current/ia64/iso-cd/debian-31r2-ia64-binary-1.iso


You're trying to use an image aimed for "IA64" architecture, which is
*different* from amd64. IA64==Intel Itanium, in short.

I suggest you use an image for i386 as there are no official images of
Debian sarge for the amd64 architecture. The next version of Debian
will have a specific port ot AMD64.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: