Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Well if it is only for d-i, maybe it should be a udeb package? The only > concern I have with that is that it has to go through NEW... A udeb isn't really appropriate for a -pic package, since it would be used at image build time, not run time, and the pic library would not actually be included on any install image. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature