[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: glibc udebs

Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Well if it is only for d-i, maybe it should be a udeb package? The only 
> concern I have with that is that it has to go through NEW...

A udeb isn't really appropriate for a -pic package, since it would be
used at image build time, not run time, and the pic library would not
actually be included on any install image.

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: