[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#369038: marked as done (debian-installer: [PPC] [Old World] May 24th and May 25th 2006 miBoot floppy images broken)



Your message dated Sun, 28 May 2006 11:02:14 -0400
with message-id <20060528110214.383d5153@revor.fionavar.dd>
and subject line Fixed in May 27th images
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (50, 'testing'), (7, 'unstable'), (3, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-powerpc
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

On a Motorola StarMax 4000/160 mac-clone based on the Apple Tanzania motherboard 
(MacOS 9.1 reports it as a PowerMac 4400), the daily miBoot floppy images for old world 
powerpc work for May 13th to May 23rd builds, but as of the May 24th and 25th builds 
the images result in disks that are ejected shortly after being accessed.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The latest images (May 27th) fixes this.

- -- 
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEebt/hvWBpdQuHxwRAq18AKChD+tb1k8j+wGCHtNLat5dV2JCmQCfQxf5
97kyB3mFO2PWz6xrDwrUGa8=
=/S8N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: