[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dates of ppc daily builds old? WAS: request clarification on sbp2 and tg3



On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:31:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:10:04AM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> >   > Try the latest daily builds, and file an installation report if it is still
> >   > broken, and complain loudly here if it is not fixed yet :)
> > 
> > The daily builds for ppc in
> > 
> >   http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/
> > 
> > are from April 1, and it appears that the other architectures were updated
> > today.  Is this just a wrong timestamp on the ppc daily builds, or are they
> > actually not being built?
> 
> There's a build problem, as various people have pointed out. This is
> mostly due to me not having updated my build machine for a little while
> to include Sven's mkvmlinuz fixes, since I needed that machine to work
> and the big switch to modular X scared me off for a while. Sorry about
> that.

Noticed that i was going to fix this a an hour or so ago, but since someone
took my commit right away, it is now your responsability to fix it.

> I've upgraded to current unstable now and will upload all the bits as
> soon as I can; I'm suffering from ISP routing brokenness today which
> isn't helping, but that should be sorted out soon. If simply updating
> d-i doesn't do it, I'll comment out the broken bits in debian-cd for the
> time being, although that will probably break chrp and prep which would
> not be good, so I hope I won't need to.

prep is useless on 2.6.16 anyway, since the arch=ppc -> arch=powerpc fix broke
it, so it can be done without. For the rest, the mkvmlinuz and 2.6.16 stuff i
did last week should allow you to build not only a kernel with builtin initrd
for 32bit chrp but also for 64bit, as some guys asked for a few month ago.

Still, i don't understand why svn commit access was taken away from me, and i
don't see any technical reason for this having happened, since i never misused
it, and even when you took over, i did my best to help you as best i could,
and gave you all the information i had.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: