[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped


directfb 0.9.24-1 is now in experimental. Please test it and report any
problems. I will not move it to unstable for at least a week (plus the
time RMs may need due to other transitions, etc). I'll send another mail
just 2 days before uploading.

For the RMs, when would it be fine with you to move directfb from
experimental to sid? The following lists what's required for this
small "transition".

Packages build-depending on an unversioned directfb (only binNMU
required, which I have successfully built with the new directfb):

  Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
  Package: libcairo-directfb

  Maintainer: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>
  Package: gcompris

  Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün <gurkan@linuks.mine.nu>
  Package: links2

  Maintainer: Mesa package maintainers
  Package: mesa

Packages build-depending on a versioned directfb (sourceful upload

  Maintainer: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
  Package: dfb++, fusionsound

  Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
  Package: directvnc

  Maintainer: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>
  Package: freesci

  Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
  Package: gtk+2.0-directfb

  Maintainer: Debian SDL packages maintainers
  Package: libsdl1.2

Packages build-depending on directfb, but not really using it:

  Maintainer: Martin Albert <ma@debian.org>
  Package: libggi

  Maintainer: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>
  Package: paintlib

I'll be filing bug reports about these last two ones.


Reply to: