On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:28:14PM +0100, wrote: > > cool! this way we can check if we have uncovered codes (we can detect > > missing glyphs) using the current fonts the following 43 glyphs are missing: vi 01A1 vi 01AF vi 01B0 vi 0309 fa 06F0 fa 06F1 fa 06F2 fa 06F3 fa 06F5 fa 06F6 fa 06F8 fa 06F9 vi 1EA2 vi 1EA3 vi 1EA9 vi 1EB3 vi 1EBB vi 1EC3 vi 1EC9 vi 1ECE vi 1ECF vi 1ED4 vi 1ED5 vi 1EDB vi 1EDD vi 1EDE vi 1EDF vi 1EE1 vi 1EE3 vi 1EE7 vi 1EE8 vi 1EE9 vi 1EEB vi 1EED vi 1EEF vi 1EF1 vi 1EF7 bg 2116 vi 2501 ja 306C ko B784 ko BE10 ko D1A8 As for Vietnamese I'm well aware of the missing glyphs; ja and ko have been hopefully fixed with the latest upload of cjk fonts (which I haven't checked yet). Didn't know about the missing glyphs for Farsi and bg. regards, Davide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature