[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GTK frontend - New milestone reached



Hi Alastair,

On Monday 17 October 2005 21:52, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> I've just uploaded a new version of gtk+2.0-directfb that includes -dev
> and .deb packages. With these, it should be possible to build the
> frontend.
>
> They haven't been fully tested yet, but I'd like comments and testing
> please.

I've been working on building the frontend from the libs.

Comments:
1. shouldn't the -dev package depend on the lib package?
2. to make the frontend compile correctly, I've had to make 3 changes
   in the .pc files:

$ diff -u temp/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gdk-directfb-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gdk-directfb-2.0.pc
--- temp/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gdk-directfb-2.0.pc  2005-10-17 20:45:21.000000000 +0200
+++ /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gdk-directfb-2.0.pc      2005-10-28 18:29:28.729874897 +0200
@@ -8,5 +8,5 @@
 Description: GIMP Drawing Kit (${target} target)
 Version: 2.0.9
 Requires: gdk-pixbuf-2.0 directfb pangoft2
-Libs: -L${libdir} -lgdk-${target}-2.0
-Cflags: -I${includedir}/gtk-2.0 -I${libdir}/gtk-2.0/include  -I/usr/include/freetype2
+Libs: -L${libdir} -lgdk-${target}
+Cflags: -I${includedir}/gtk-2.0 -I${includedir}/gtk-2.0/gdk -I${libdir}/gtk-2.0/include  -I/usr/include/freetype2

$ diff -u temp/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gtk+-directfb-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gtk+-directfb-2.0.pc
--- temp/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gtk+-directfb-2.0.pc 2005-10-17 20:45:46.000000000 +0200
+++ /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gtk+-directfb-2.0.pc     2005-10-28 18:28:39.931952826 +0200
@@ -11,5 +11,5 @@
 Description: GIMP Tool Kit (${target} target)
 Version: 2.0.9
 Requires: gdk-${target}-2.0 atk
-Libs: -L${libdir} -lgtk-${target}-2.0
+Libs: -L${libdir} -lgtk-${target}
 Cflags: -I${includedir}/gtk-2.0

Could you check these changes and upload a fixed version?

I've updated the cdebconf-gtk source in SVN to build from gtk+-directfb (with
help from Colin), so you can also try for yourself. There are some warnings
near the end from dpkg-shlibdeps that need looking into.

Thanks,
Frans

Attachment: pgpFDuvDWmGPo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: