[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#332957: fixed in gtk+2.0-directfb


Yes, that makes more sense :-)

I'll change the depends line tonight. I think I'll leave the libc-udeb
for the moment, as it is possible people will come up with libcs' othe
than libc in the future (dietlibc, klibc, etc.) that will do what we


On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 12:24 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> found 332957
> thanks
> On Tuesday 11 October 2005 22:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >    * Add Provides: libgtk-directfb-2.0-0. Closes: #332957.
> Alastair,
> That is very usefull for letting other udebs depend on this package, but 
> not actually what I meant :-)
> The udeb currently has:
> Depends: libc-udeb, libdirectfb-0.9-22-udeb
> What I meant was this could now be changed to:
> Depends: libc-udeb, libdirectfb-0.9-22
> I feel this is more in line with other udebs, but I'll leave it to you to 
> decide if you want to change this or just close the bug again (or leave 
> it open as a reminder for a later date).
> (The depends for "libc-udeb" could also be changed to plain "libc6" (for 
> i386 at least), but it is probably easier to do that when you can switch 
> to using ${shlibs:Depends} in the control file.)
> Cheers,

Reply to: