Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:46:39PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:41:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:24:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > > * Joey Hess <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2005-01-10 16:24]:
> > > > > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking
> > > > > that) are
> > > >
> > > > mips and mipsel have been updated. However, given the new local
> > > > root exploit (fixed in SVN), we'll all need to make another round
> > > > of updates anyway.
> > >
> > > Josh Kwan and I chatted about this yesterday on IRC. He and I are
> > > both pretty happy with kernel-source-2.4.27 as it is, but I would
> > > like a chance to go through recent bug reports just to make sure
> > > there isn't anything missing. As a result we are aiming to release
> > > next week.
> Sorry for this taking a bit longer than I had hoped. I now have
> kernel-source-2.4.27 in a state where I am happy to release it as
> I have made both kernel-source-2.4.27 and kernel-image-2.4.27-i386 up on
> http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/ for people to take a look at.
> I aim to releaase these verbatim tomorrow if there are no objections. If
> you make an updates to SVN please drop me an email, so I make sure that
> they make it in. As I am not intending to rebuild again. If you put
> email@example.com in To or CC then it will go to the top of my
> mail-reading priority list.
I take it by the stunning silence that no one has any objections to
these packages. I have gone ahead and uploaded them to d.o just now.