[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#286184: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)



Your message dated Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:55:14 +0100
with message-id <20041218095514.GM13755@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Bug#286184: Package:  installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at bugs) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2004 07:01:13 +0000
>From audilvr@speakeasy.org Fri Dec 17 23:01:13 2004
Return-path: <audilvr@speakeasy.org>
Received: from duchess.speedfactory.net [66.23.201.84] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CfYaX-00037b-00; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:01:13 -0800
Received: (qmail 26241 invoked by uid 89); 18 Dec 2004 07:00:58 -0000
Received: from duchess.speedfactory.net (66.23.201.84)
  by duchess.speedfactory.net with SMTP; 18 Dec 2004 07:00:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 26238 invoked by uid 89); 18 Dec 2004 07:00:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.6?) (66.23.214.66)
  by duchess.speedfactory.net with SMTP; 18 Dec 2004 07:00:58 -0000
Subject: Package:  installation-reports
From: Raylynn Knight <audilvr@speakeasy.org>
To: bugs@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[🔎] 1103353234.10468.101.camel@mandrake.knightsmanor.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6-1mdk 
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 02:00:34 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: bugs@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 14 Dec 2004 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/rc2/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso

uname -a: Linux pb1400 2.4.27 #11 Sun Dec 12 15:55:40 EST 2004 ppc unknown

Date: 17 Dec 2004 ~21:30 

Method: Created boot kernel by combining /install/powerpc/2.4/initrd.gz from CD with kernel compiled from
bk://nubus-pmac.bkbits.net/linuxppc-2.4-nubus.  Used MkLinux booter to boot this kernel and used the above
CD in an externally attached SCSI CD drive.  Used debconf/priority=low command line parameter as first
attempt with default was unsuccessful.

Machine: Apple PowerBook 1400c/133
Processor: 603e 133Mhz
Memory: 64 MB
Root Device: IDE /dev/hda9  
Root Size/partition table: 
/dev/hda
        #                    type name                length   base    ( size )                system
/dev/hda1     Apple_partition_map Apple                   63 @ 1       ( 31.5k)                Partition map
/dev/hda2          Apple_Driver43 Macintosh               54 @ 64      ( 27.0k)                Driver 4.3
/dev/hda2          Apple_Driver43 Macintosh               74 @ 118     ( 37.0k)                Driver 4.3
/dev/hda4        Apple_Driver_ATA Macintosh               54 @ 192     ( 27.0k)                Unknown
/dev/hda5        Apple_Driver_ATA Macintosh               74 @ 246     ( 37.0k)                Unknown
/dev/hda6           Apple_Patches Patch Partition        512 @ 320     (256.0k)                Unknown
/dev/hda7               Apple_HFS untitled           1048576 @ 832     (512.0M)                HFS
/dev/hda8         Apple_UNIX_SVR2 swap                262144 @ 1049408 (128.0M)                Linux swap
/dev/hda9         Apple_UNIX_SVR2 Linux              7140528 @ 1311552 (  3.4G)                Linux native

Block size=512, Number of Blocks=8452079
DeviceType=0x0, DeviceId=0x0
Drivers-
1: @ 64 for 22, type=0x01
2: @ 118 for 36, type=0xffff
3: @ 192 for 20, type=0x701
4: @ 246 for 33, type=0xf8ff

Output of lspci and lspci -n:

N/A - This is a NuBus based system.

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [E]
Reboot:                 [O]

Comments/Problems:

Loading the installer modules complains about not finding kernel modules, but message seems
harmless as I'm using a monolithic kernel.  

Partitioning gives message about not having information about the default type of partition table
for this architecture, but otherwise works just fine.

Unable to install boot loader which is no surprise considering the installer would need to know
to mount the HFS partition and copy the kernel as 'Mach Kernel' into the MacOs System Folder Extensions.
I did this manually after rebooting into MacOS.

I now have added incentive to fix the driver for my wireless card!!!


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 286184-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2004 09:55:46 +0000
>From bubulle@kheops.frmug.org Sat Dec 18 01:55:46 2004
Return-path: <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>
Received: from perrier.eu.org (kheops.homeunix.org) [81.56.227.253] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CfbJR-00046t-00; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 01:55:46 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A62FB4F97A; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:55:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kheops.homeunix.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 19476-04; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:55:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [192.168.1.3])
	by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 19D1B4F975; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:55:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
	id 8C36A2326B; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:55:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:55:14 +0100
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: Raylynn Knight <audilvr@speakeasy.org>,
	286184-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#286184: Package:  installation-reports
Message-ID: <20041218095514.GM13755@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
References: <[🔎] 1103353234.10468.101.camel@mandrake.knightsmanor.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 1103353234.10468.101.camel@mandrake.knightsmanor.net>
X-message-flag: Outlook is a good virus spreading tool. It can send mail, too.
X-pot_a_miel: honeypot@kheops.frmug.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at kheops.frmug.org
Delivered-To: 286184-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


> Loading the installer modules complains about not finding kernel modules, but message seems
> harmless as I'm using a monolithic kernel.  
> 
> Partitioning gives message about not having information about the default type of partition table
> for this architecture, but otherwise works just fine.
> 
> Unable to install boot loader which is no surprise considering the installer would need to know
> to mount the HFS partition and copy the kernel as 'Mach Kernel' into the MacOs System Folder Extensions.
> I did this manually after rebooting into MacOS.
> 
> I now have added incentive to fix the driver for my wireless card!!!


Given that this install report is a complete success report, I do as
usual with successful install report : I close the bug..:-)

This does not of course mean you weren't right to report. Knowing the
installations are correct is important for the d-i team.

Many thanks for yourtime testing the Debian Installer and reporting
your results. Have fun with your new Debian system!




Reply to: