Re: lilo/grub image background? [was Re: bootsplash option for d-i?]
Dimarts 16 Novembre 2004 21:29, en/na Andrew Pollock (<Andrew Pollock
<email@example.com>>) va escriure:
>>Re: lilo/grub image background? [was Re: bootsplash option for d-i?]
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:06:25PM +0100, Xan wrote:
> > > > Since we're mentioning Ubuntu, the reason we rejected the bootsplash
> > > > patch for the Ubuntu kernel was that including it broke the part of
> > > > the installer that starts up the framebuffer in a way that we
> > > > concluded was impossible to repair within the design of bootsplash.
> > And what's about lilo/grub background image?. Is that an option in d-i?
> > Perhaps an interesting thing: if we could not have the bootsplash, we
> > could have lilo/grub graphical display.
> I believe that boils down to the grub and lilo packages providing one, and
> there being a consensus on what the image should be...
> I have also heard that in certain combinations of hardware, kicking into
> the video mode required to display the graphic causes issues, so in the
> interests of reliability, it has been left alone.
Okay. Thanks. I see that debian seems "less-graphical" than another distro
veyr long time :)