Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <[🔎] 20041009212245.GF4394@fsk.uni-heidelberg.de> > >I was able to build rootskel 1.05 about two days ago on sparc using a > >sarge system. So rootskel is buildable in sarge, but not in sid. > > Confirmed. > > Release-managers: should I upload the version of rootskel I built on a > sarge system to sid? rootskel is currently holding up the build of > d-i rc2. (rootskel depends on glibc which does not build due to a > binutils bug.) Please go ahead. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature