[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#275855: marked as done (Where is net-drivers.img ? (Regression compared to rc1))



Your message dated Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:18:42 +0200
with message-id <200410102018.42180.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#275855: Where is net-drivers.img ? (Regression compared to rc1)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2004 17:16:51 +0000
>From christophe@courtois.cc Sun Oct 10 10:16:51 2004
Return-path: <christophe@courtois.cc>
Received: from smtp-100-sunday.nerim.net (kraid.nerim.net) [62.4.16.100] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CGhJT-0001KI-00; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:16:51 -0700
Received: from choupi.local (christophecourtois.org [80.65.225.121])
	by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D51541B7B
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:16:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Christophe Courtois <christophe@courtois.cc>
Organization: Anamorphoses et Xylophones
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Where is net-drivers.img ? (Regression compared to rc1)
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:16:46 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
X-PGPKey: 0F33E837
X-PGPFingerprint: FE0F 19F2 67DE 29F1 2A4B 19F2 2A6B 90C5 0F33 E837
X-Homepage: http://www.courtois.cc/
X-Distribution: Debian Woody/Sarge (Linux v2.4)
X-HolyWar: KDE,vi,Linux,Debian,Java,PostgreSQL
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200410101916.46206@christophecourtois.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: <pre-rc2 (30-sep-2004), from 
http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/>
uname -a: <not tried>
Date: <10-oct-2004>
Method: <Booted from floppies from install/ from the ISO. 
failed because network card drivers are not provided on floppies.>

Machine: <Old desktop, PC compatible>
Processor: Pentium 75
Memory: 40 Mo
Root Device: <IDE>
Root Size/partition table: <Not detected as all modules were not loaded>
Output of lspci and lspci -n:

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [E]
Config network:         [E]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [E]
Detect hard drives:     [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:    [ ]
Mount partitions:       [ ]
Install base system:    [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]

Comments/Problems:

<With rc1, I was very pleased to see that I needn't to burn an ISO to 
install a box, only to boot with 4 floppies. I was disappointed with 
rc2, as I didn't find any net-drivers.img, and as my network card is an 
old ISA ne2, the network is not detected and I must stop there. I 
suppose I'll have to burn a CD, hoping that this old CD player will 
accept to read it. That would be good to have net-drivers.img back if 
possible.
 Nice work, anyway. - Christophe>


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 275855-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2004 18:19:17 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Sun Oct 10 11:19:17 2004
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CGiHs-0000fW-00; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 11:19:16 -0700
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.86] ident=fjp)
	by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CGiHJ-0008SK-00; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:18:41 +0200
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: Christophe Courtois <christophe@courtois.cc>,
 275855-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#275855: Where is net-drivers.img ? (Regression compared to rc1)
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:18:42 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[🔎] 200410101916.46206@christophecourtois.org>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200410101916.46206@christophecourtois.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200410102018.42180.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 275855-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sunday 10 October 2004 19:16, Christophe Courtois wrote:
> <With rc1, I was very pleased to see that I needn't to burn an ISO to
> install a box, only to boot with 4 floppies. I was disappointed with
> rc2, as I didn't find any net-drivers.img, and as my network card is an
> old ISA ne2, the network is not detected and I must stop there. I
> suppose I'll have to burn a CD, hoping that this old CD player will
> accept to read it. That would be good to have net-drivers.img back if
> possible.

The net-drivers floppy image is not there as you don't need it for an 
installation where you boot from floppy, but install from CD.
Why would you download the entire CD if you're not going to use it?

Just download the floppy images from [1] if you want to do an network 
installation; you won't need the cd-drivers floppy.

[1] http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/pre-rc2/floppy/

I'm closing this report as there is no bug.

Cheers,
FJP



Reply to: