Bug#275184: marked as done (Installation report)
Your message dated Wed, 6 Oct 2004 21:03:45 +0200
with message-id <200410062103.45703.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line noapic+nolapic works
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2004 13:37:59 +0000
>From pwh@tufnell.lon1.poggs.net Wed Oct 06 06:37:58 2004
Return-path: <pwh@tufnell.lon1.poggs.net>
Received: from tufnell.london.poggs.net (tufnell.lon1.poggs.net) [193.109.197.25] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CFBzS-0001JG-00; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 06:37:58 -0700
Received: by tufnell.lon1.poggs.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8A41F8486; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 14:37:56 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 14:37:56 +0100
From: Peter Hicks <peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Installation report
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20041006133756.GI20918@tufnell.lon1.poggs.net>
Reply-To: Peter Hicks <peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: pre-rc2
uname -a: n/a
Date: 6th October 2004, 1430
Method: Network boot using PXE
Machine: Compaq ProLiant DL380
Processor: 1.3GHz Pentium III
Memory: 128M
Root Device: Would be SCSI
Root Size/partition table: n/a
Output of lspci and lspci -n: n/a
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [E]
Configure network HW: [ ]
Config network: [ ]
Detect CD: [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives: [ ]
Create file systems: [ ]
Mount partitions: [ ]
Install base system: [ ]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
Comments/Problems:
When booting from the 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, I have the following crash even
before I can even start installing the system...
kernel BUG at apic.c:307!
invalid operand: 0000
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[<c028725d>] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010246
eax: 00000000 ebx: 00040011 ecx: c023ea68 edx: c023ea78
esi: 00000011 edi: c0105000 ebp: 0003e000 esp: c027ffd4
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c027f000)
Stack: 00000002 00049800 c02877d6 c0280699 c0210560 00007ffc 00007ffc
00007ffc
00007ffc c029aa60 c0100191
Call Trace:
Code: 0f 0b 33 01 ea 2a 21 c0 83 c8 ff 87 05 e0 e0 ff ff 8b 1d d0
<0>Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task!
I've tried booting with 'noapic' but it doesn't help. I'm going to find out
how to hand-roll a kernel that I know works :)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 275184-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2004 19:04:18 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Wed Oct 06 12:04:17 2004
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CFH5F-00021G-00; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:04:17 -0700
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.86] ident=fjp)
by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CFH4j-0001HR-00
for <275184-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 21:03:45 +0200
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: 275184-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: noapic+nolapic works
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 21:03:45 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200410062103.45703.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 275184-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Peter reported by private email that using noapic + nolapic solved the
bootproblems for him. So closing this report.
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 20:47, you wrote:
> Now I can get on with the job of proving Debain works on Compaq hardware
> and speccing up an SMP box with lots of RAID :)
Please submit a new installation report if you have any more findings from the
installation.
Reply to: