Bug#274486: marked as done (preseed: looks need to rewrite debconf/frontend before reboot)
Your message dated Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:34:53 +0200
with message-id <200410051434.53174.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#274486: preseed: looks need to rewrite debconf/frontend before reboot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2004 06:39:42 +0000
>From kmuto@debian.org Fri Oct 01 23:39:42 2004
Return-path: <kmuto@debian.org>
Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CDdYU-000187-00; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 23:39:42 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81119222F43
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:39:40 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 22542-05 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:39:40 +0900 (JST)
Received: from hellhound (orochi.topstudio.co.jp [202.224.239.193])
by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52624222F39
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:39:40 +0900 (JST)
Received: by hellhound (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BD71C214094; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:39:40 +0900 (JST)
From: Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: preseed: looks need to rewrite debconf/frontend before reboot
X-Debbugs-CC: Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>
User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 15) (Security Through Obscurity) (i386-debian-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20041002063940.BD71C214094@hellhound>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:39:40 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp
X-BadReturnPath: kmuto@hellhound.kmuto.org rewritten as kmuto@debian.org
using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: preseed
Severity: important
Version: 1.00
When I tried d-i with my debconf seed, 1st stage is OK, but 2nd stage
goes infinite loop because Newt frontend can't be found.
d-i 1st stage uses newt fronend by default, so debconf seed file
includes:
d-i debconf/frontend string newt
But 2nd stage hasn't this forntend, has 'Dialog' instead of it.
IMHO preseed or base-config should rewrite this variable.
Thanks,
--
Kenshi Muto
kmuto@debian.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 274486-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2004 12:36:00 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Tue Oct 05 05:36:00 2004
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CEoXv-0007Nm-00; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 05:36:00 -0700
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.86] ident=fjp)
by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CEoWr-0001sF-00; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:34:53 +0200
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers),
274486-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#274486: preseed: looks need to rewrite debconf/frontend before reboot
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:34:53 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[🔎] 20041002063940.BD71C214094@hellhound> <[🔎] 20041002162638.GH19161@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20041005141354.A9523@macwheel.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20041005141354.A9523@macwheel.xs4all.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200410051434.53174.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 274486-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This has recently been documented in the manual.
Cheers,
FJP
Reply to: