[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: partman-efi



On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:22:15AM -0700, Jim Lieb wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 July 2004 10:05, Joey Hess wrote:
> > dann frazier wrote:
> > >   Jim Lieb filed a patch for #257910 which adds the partman-efi
> > > package and adds efi support to partman-auto.  I've tested an image
> > > he made for us, and it worked fine on my system.
> > >
> > >   I'd appreciate if someone more partman knowledgable than I could
> > > take a look at the patch; if it looks reasonable to such a person,
> > > I'll be happy to commit these changes and do an upload.
> >
> > I looked at it mainly to see if we should consider it for this
> > month's release. It adds new strings, and depends on a efi-udeb that
> > does not seem to exist yet, so I think we should hold off on it until
> > after the release, as we're currently in a string freeze, and have
> > only a few days to get final udebs into the archive. After that, it
> > looks ok to me, of course I don't know a lot about either partman or
> > efi so am not the most qualified to look at it.

> The strings in the template have already been "translated" for the 
> most part.  I picked the strings from the hppa/palo boot and did an
> s/palo/efi/g on them. The big translation part is patch set I made for 
> the manual.

It is not safe to assume that s/palo/efi/g will give grammatically
correct results in all languages.  If you do commit a patch including
such automated translations, please mark the translations as "fuzzy" for
any languages you don't personally know.

> Given that without this patch, people will end up doing a complete base
> install and *then* find out that elilo-installer can't find a partition 
> will make for bug reports like the one filed.  I'm no language expert
> but the strings are passable and the manual is necessary to keep happy
> clients even if it is only in english at present.  I believe that is
> preferable to having bug reports from users after they see a message 
> that they should have seen 20 mins earlier indicating that they have
> to repeat that 30 min exercise with little enlightement as to what the
> problem entails.

Been there, done that -- see aboot-installer for comparison. :)

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: