Frans Pop wrote: > Hmmm. He has a good point there. > In fact, IMHO it is pretty bad that we don't support the Beta4 floppy images > and netboot any more (20040430 is Beta4!). > This could cause a lot of unnecessary "failed installation" reports. > > Shouldn't we keep udebs for abandoned kernel versions available on the mirrors > a bit longer? I removed the old kernel udebs from sarge when I was under the mistaken impression that we were going to have a release within a week of DebConf4. These changes have to be made a little while before release. Of course the direct links to the beta4 floppy images were removed from the web site when I realised this had broken them, and when the release didn't happen. You'll notice that a great many beta4 images are broken, also including all the businesscards, for other reasons. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature