[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#257099: debian-installer: report



Joshua Wise wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: 2004/07/01 0100EDT - netboot images - "current"

Define "current" with an URL please.

> When I went to detect the hard drives using the netboot stuff, the modules for 
> IDE were not there. This does not seem like a sane default to me. 
> Additionally, even after it attempted to download more modules, it seemingly 
> could not find them on the server. My resolution was to manually gunzip the 
> monolithic initrd as well as the netboot initrd, and copy in some filesystems 
> and IDE drivers.

Everyone *else* who's reported this was using the beta 4 netboot images
or something like that and had a kernel mismatch with the ide-modules
udeb in the archive.

> When I went to install the base system, I ran out of room on the compactflash. 
> This is understandable - after all, it is only 128MB. I'm not quite certain 
> why we are installing exim or other things like it by default, however. Exim 
> vs. Postfix vs. Sendmail vs. Qmail vs. whatever will be a decision made 
> later. Likewise with perl - I will likely not need perl on this system.
> 
> Also, it would be preferable for d-i to rm dpkgs immediately after installing 
> them, also to save space.
> 
> Perhaps I'm just failing to look in the general case, though, instead of just 
> my EPIA's case. Insight?

I believe that 128 mb installs should be possible on systems that install
from CD or have sufficient memory. #246007

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: