also sprach Joey Hess <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004.06.25.1808 +0200]: > On the other hand, if I'm installing a system with d-i, I probably > don't want to use lvm. I prefer to keep my systems simple and > I don't need the complication of lvm on them. This is a personal > preference, and maybe I shouldn't be using the autopartitioner. > But if lvm support is added, we need to at least consider giving > users the option of profiles that don't use it. Yes, certainly. In expert mode. But, provided that LVM has reached a stable point (which it seems to have), the average user will likely profit from LVM in that a second harddisk can be easily inserted into the system. Much better than additional mount points and the like... -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature