Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> [2004-05-15 10:25]: > > > would slow down development quite a few. I suppose I can commit it in > > > 5 days, because we said udebs need to be in unstable for 5 days before > > > we consider moving them to testing. Is this the right thing to do? > > > > Even if you wait 5 days, we would then have broken LVM installs for 5 > > more days until the new initrd-tools reaches testing, and the > > Why? I thought you said udebs have to be in unstable for at least > days before we consider moving them to testing. So if I upload the > udeb to unstable in 5 days, it definitely won't go into testing for > another 5 days anyway (5 + 5 + 10: by that time the new initrd-tools > is in testing, and then we can consider moving the udeb). Because sid_d-i CDs use udebs from unstable, with debs from testing. So if the old initrd-tools is in testing and the new base-installer is in unstable, LVM installs will be broken. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature