[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#219890: marked as done (ethdetect: Strange main-menu item title)



Your message dated Sun, 09 May 2004 02:02:04 -0400
with message-id <E1BMhO0-00035R-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#219890: fixed in ddetect 0.95
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2003 23:44:36 +0000
>From sprite@sprite.fr.eu.org Sun Nov 09 17:44:36 2003
Return-path: <sprite@sprite.fr.eu.org>
Received: from smtp-100-sunday.noc.nerim.net (mallaury.noc.nerim.net) [62.4.17.100] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AIzER-0007Ct-00; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 17:44:36 -0600
Received: from sprite.fr.eu.org (sprite.fr.eu.org [213.41.136.74])
	by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCD462E73
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:44:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from spliff.sprite.patnet ([192.168.0.2])
	by sprite.fr.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AIzEP-0007xd-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:44:33 +0100
Received: from sprite by spliff.sprite.patnet with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AIzEP-0003rY-QG; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:44:33 +0100
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:44:33 +0100
From: Jeremie Koenig <sprite@sprite.fr.eu.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ethdetect: Strange main-menu item title
Message-ID: <20031109234433.GC14756@spliff.sprite.patnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Jeremie Koenig <sprite@spliff.sprite.patnet>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: ethdetect
Version: 0.56
Severity: minor

Ethdetect's menu entry text is "Detect network hardware". However, at
DEBCONF_PRIORITY=low, ethdetect's first question is "Would you like me
to try to detect hardware ?", and the user can manually choose which
module to install.

I think the menu item should read "Configure network hardware" instead.

-- 
Jeremie Koenig <sprite@sprite.fr.eu.org>

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 219890-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2004 06:08:02 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sat May 08 23:08:02 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BMhTm-00052B-00; Sat, 08 May 2004 23:08:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BMhO0-00035R-00; Sun, 09 May 2004 02:02:04 -0400
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
To: 219890-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#219890: fixed in ddetect 0.95
Message-Id: <E1BMhO0-00035R-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 02:02:04 -0400
Delivered-To: 219890-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Source: ddetect
Source-Version: 0.95

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ddetect, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

archdetect_0.95_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.95_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.95.dsc
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.95.dsc
ddetect_0.95.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.95.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.95_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.95_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.95_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect-full_0.95_all.udeb
hw-detect_0.95_all.udeb
  to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect_0.95_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 219890@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org> (supplier of updated ddetect package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  8 May 2004 22:29:54 -0700
Source: ddetect
Binary: hw-detect-full archdetect hw-detect ethdetect
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.95
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Description: 
 archdetect - Hardware architect detector (udeb)
 ethdetect  - Detect network hardware and load kernel drivers for it (udeb)
 hw-detect  - Detect hardware and load kernel drivers for it (udeb)
 hw-detect-full - Detect hardware and load kernel drivers for it (full version) (udeb)
Closes: 219890 247941
Changes: 
 ddetect (0.95) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Colin Watson
     - Bump priorities of hw-detect and hw-detect-full to standard, in line
       with the override file.
   * Joey Hess
     - Follow cdrom-detect's lead by making ethdetect ask for a driver
       floppy if the network card detection fails and no module was
       selected from the manual list. The previous method didn't work
       since many media lack a menu item to load floppies. Closes: #247941
     - BTW, think "firmware floppy". :-(
     - Always autodetect network hardware. The question about whether to do
       this was asked as low priority; hw-detect is safe and always asks at low
       priority before loading modules, so the question was redundant.
       Closes: #219890
   * Joshua Kwan
     - Devnames for PCMCIA devices, as given by their built in names, using
       the information from /var/run/stab. Woohoo!
   * Christian Perrier
     - s/ethernet/Ethernet in new templates
   * Updated translations:
     - Czech (cs.po) by Miroslav Kure
     - Danish (da.po) by Claus Hindsgaul
     - German (de.po) by Alwin Meschede
     - Greek (el.po) by Konstantinos Margaritis
     - French (fr.po) by Christian Perrier
     - Italian (it.po) by Davide Viti
     - Japanese (ja.po) by Kenshi Muto
     - Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by Andr�© Lu�­s Lopes
     - Portuguese (pt.po) by Miguel Figueiredo
     - Swedish (sv.po) by Andr�© Dahlqvist
     - Ukrainian (uk.po) by Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
Files: 
 8772dc7ea6ae6df1fe964fb5f2275bcf 1459 debian-installer standard ddetect_0.95.dsc
 7cd3614bf8817e066d54f78b9ba9cf2b 77950 debian-installer standard ddetect_0.95.tar.gz
 5f71f1b81bf0c20e9d805bb8bf26eb10 31076 debian-installer standard hw-detect_0.95_all.udeb
 bd384963e8e30250da9fc6c8b5bd4cdf 11154 debian-installer optional ethdetect_0.95_all.udeb
 9906bcdc6a0c764b0ed9f1d7180a7a6c 2524 debian-installer standard hw-detect-full_0.95_all.udeb
 5222b264e32cd35ffcd26f8d7acee93e 2368 debian-installer standard archdetect_0.95_i386.udeb
package-type: udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc
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=Rd24
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: