[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#240438: marked as done (debian-installer: build_floppy_root fails on Kernel 2.6)



Your message dated Fri, 02 Apr 2004 13:56:44 +0900
with message-id <20040402045644.6882A222EF3@mail.topstudio.co.jp>
and subject line debian-installer: build_floppy_root fails on Kernel 2.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2004 11:12:14 +0000
>From kmuto@debian.org Sat Mar 27 03:12:14 2004
Return-path: <kmuto@debian.org>
Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B7Bja-0004bS-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 03:12:14 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97D022309A
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:12:12 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
	id 06211-02 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
	Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:12:12 +0900 (JST)
Received: from hellhound (orochi.topstudio.co.jp [202.224.239.193])
	by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947CB223050
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:12:12 +0900 (JST)
Received: by hellhound (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id DFADD2140C4; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:12:11 +0900 (JST)
From: Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: debian-installer: build_floppy_root fails on Kernel 2.6
X-Debbugs-CC: Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>
User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 15) (Security Through Obscurity) (i386-debian-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <20040327111211.DFADD2140C4@hellhound>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:12:11 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp
X-BadReturnPath: kmuto@hellhound.kmuto.org rewritten as kmuto@debian.org
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: debian-installer
Severity: important

I found debian-installer fails when I choose build_floppy_root on
kernel 2.6. Error message is 'depmod: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented'.

I figured out what was problem.

Makefile is:
if [ -e $(TREE)/boot/System.map-$(VERSION) ]; then \
                        depmod -F $(TREE)/boot/System.map-$(VERSION) -q -a -b $(TREE)/ $(VERSION); \
                        mv $(TREE)/boot/System.map-$(VERSION) $(TEMP); \
                else \
                        depmod -q -a -b $(TREE)/ $(VERSION); \
                fi;)

It works good since we don't separate kernel and root file system
(TREE/boot/System.map-version exists).
But there isn't System.map in root floppy tree. 'depmod' without -F
looks current working kernel system map, and is failed by module
incompatibility.
I believe it is 'lucky' that build works on kernel 2.4 series.

I think build_floppy_root needs to provide System.map-version from
di-kernel-image during depmod process (and remove after depmod is
suceeded).

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
kmuto@debian.org

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.2-1-686
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 240438-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2004 04:56:46 +0000
>From kmuto@topstudio.co.jp Thu Apr 01 20:56:46 2004
Return-path: <kmuto@topstudio.co.jp>
Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B9GjW-0005hW-00; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 20:56:46 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9020F222F72
	for <240438-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri,  2 Apr 2004 13:56:44 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
	id 16399-07 for <240438-done@bugs.debian.org>;
	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:56:44 +0900 (JST)
Received: from cyclopus.topstudio-unet.ocn.ne.jp.topstudio.co.jp (cyclopus.topstudio-unet.ocn.ne.jp [192.168.1.3])
	by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6882A222EF3
	for <240438-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri,  2 Apr 2004 13:56:44 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 13:56:44 +0900
From: Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>
To: 240438-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: debian-installer: build_floppy_root fails on Kernel 2.6
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.23 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 15) (Security Through Obscurity) (i386-debian-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <20040402045644.6882A222EF3@mail.topstudio.co.jp>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp
Delivered-To: 240438-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

This bug is already fixed in CVS.



Reply to: