Re: Supported install hardware for Sarge?
Speaking as a user only -- I *much* prefer the first approach. The
duplication of effort is mostly just cut and paste, isn't it?
Rick
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 13:27, Joey Hess wrote:
> Miroslav Kure wrote:
> >
> > There are basically two possibilities:
> > 1. Toss the old stuff and describe installation files for each arch
> > individually.
> > pros: Easier to maintain, no need to wory your changes affect
> > other architectures.
> > cons: Some duplicate work
> > 2. Describe general, stable and valid layout of the archive
> > pros: More elegant, smaller
> > cons: If there will be more exceptions, it will turn into the
> > mess it is currently.
> >
Reply to: