[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: a test of converting to subversion



Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:29:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> [...]
> > Failing that, your b) looks not too bad. One thing that makes it easier
> > is that due to svn's different versioning method, we only need to record
> > one number, the current revision of the whole repository after it is
> > switched to subversion (will be 9500 or so).
> 
> I did not notice that, then the only point is not to disable cvs, say
> for a couple of weeks.

Maybe I can come up with something to keep only manual/ open. I'd hate
to see other commits go to the wrong place.

> Also $Id$ cvs keywords should be replaced by
> svn keywords.  Is
>   svn propset svn:keywords "Id"
> the command to be run from doc/manual/en?

Yes, that's right, I think you have to force svn to re-update the files
afterwards for the Id substitution to take place.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: