Frederik Dannemare wrote:
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:31:40PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:What say we move i386 up to the 2.4.24 kernel? All the udebs are already available, all images build ok (and still fit!), and I have even done partial CD installs using 2.4.24, though never all the way due to the broken CD I constructed with it. I'm not seeing any problems with going ahead and changing over; is anyone else?Supported; I did a full install with 2.4.24 today without seeing any (kernel-specific) problems. :-)I don't have problems with 2.4.24 either, but then again, I don't have any SMP boxes. If we go with 2.4.24, we should al least include the SMP deadlock fix from 2.4.25-pre5. Unless the plan is not to stick with 2.4.24 for the final sarge release, of course.
Looks like there is still SMP issues with the 2.4.25-pre series, though. -- Frederik Dannemare