Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > But pretty much all udebs have versioned depends or should have them > for correctness. The few bytes wasted on the versioned depends don't > realy matter and are far outweight by the daily build process (apt and > dpkg specifically) actually checking the versioned depends. > > It might not be policy to have a versioned depend but the current > implementation of d-i (run-time, not build-time) just ignores it. If > we see that we actually get version scews d-i can be made to generate > proper error for version scews later. > > I think we should change udeb policy to allow for versioned depends > but note that the run-time will not (yet) enforce them. That's reasonable. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature