Re: mklibs and brltty
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Could weak symbols solve the problem? I'm not very familiar with
> shared library internals, but I believe a weak symbol will be selected
> from the library if no other matching symbol is available. If the
> library provides such symbol, it would make mklibs happy, while the
> shared library linker would still select the symbol from the
> executable. Is this correct? I am mostly guessing based on the
> rumors I've heard about weak symbols.
dropping subdirs which aren't referenced via rpath from the resolver in
mklibs. none of that libs will be reduced.
It would be illogical to assume that all conditions remain stable.
-- Spock, "The Enterprise Incident", stardate 5027.3