tis 2003-02-25 klockan 21.00 skrev Andre L.: > Which package should I file bug reports on for the netinst image? Preferrably the "guilty" udeb ;) but if you don't know, just file them on "install". > The first problem I had was getting the slang interface > working. I don't know if this is even possible yet from the > netinst CD. It should be the default. I also noticed > the first screen talked about booting into kernel 2.2.20, > but it actually seems to wind up in 2.4.19. I don't know if the slang frontend has been added to the package lists yet. I would of course like my newt frontend to be the default instead. :-) The kernel thing sounds weird... Are you sure you're not confusing it with SYSLINUX 2.00? Rest assured though, it IS a 2.4.19 kernel. :) > After the base system installed from CD, Bochs paniced with > "cdrom: read_block: read returned -1"; this may be a bug in > Bochs not the installer. I told Bochs to continue after the > panic, and got back to the installer menu. Uh, sounds weird... > All of entries 14-16 (install kernel, LILO, Grub > respectively) failed to work for me -- in each case the > installer tried to get the package by HTTP instead of from > the CD image. I realize it's a netinst CD and only a weirdo > would try to install from it without the network. But how > come the rest of the base packages are on it, but not the > kernel and bootloader? Because netinst only has d-i and base on them... We should talk to the debian-cd team about including the necessary things for kernel-installer included too, and probably grub as well, so the netinst CD can be used for everything until the reboot... Thanks for your comments! /Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel