[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [cdebconf] empty value != no value

fre 2002-11-22 klockan 17.02 skrev Denis Barbier:
> Hi,
> debconf makes a difference between no value and an empty value.
> In order for cdebconf to have the same behaviour, question_get_field
> must return NULL if the requested field does not exist, which breaks
> many things because it is supposed to return a pointer to a string.
> May I perform all the necessary changes, and potentiolly cause some
> sigsegv if a return address is kept untested?

I for one would be very happy to see the distinction no value != empty
value. In fact, I've been pondering how to detect the "no value" case :)

I'd say go ahead, the errors are probably easy to find and fix.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel

Reply to: