[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[cdebconf] empty value != no value


debconf makes a difference between no value and an empty value.
In order for cdebconf to have the same behaviour, question_get_field
must return NULL if the requested field does not exist, which breaks
many things because it is supposed to return a pointer to a string.
May I perform all the necessary changes, and potentiolly cause some
sigsegv if a return address is kept untested?


Reply to: