Re: Post-woody

To: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@debian.org>
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Post-woody
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 21:30:40 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020524213040.59a80aa9.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87y9ebb6zf.fsf@arabella.intern.opera.no>
References: <20020411153439.GA30385@azure.humbug.org.au> <oaelhjtbi6.fsf@arroz.onshored.com> <[🔎] 87y9ebb6zf.fsf@arabella.intern.opera.no>

On 23 May 2002 10:31:32 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@debian.org> wrote:

> I think we should move to debian-installer, even though it will take
> longer time to work out.  People want to do some new development, d-i
> is getting closer to working (as in actually being able to install
> systems in a mostly-reliable way) by the day and I don't think pushing
> boot-floppies for yet another iteration would be good at all.  IMO,
> that is.

I've had zero look at debian-installer.
I wonder if it would have CJK support.
Proper CJK support is a very difficult thing to achieve...


regards,
	junichi


-- 
dancer@debian.org  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Post-woody
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>

References:
- Re: Post-woody
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Post-woody
Next by Date: cvs commit to boot-floppies/i386-specials by blade
Previous by thread: Re: Post-woody
Next by thread: Re: Post-woody
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread