Apparent BUG in Lilo wrt. initrd
I'm tracking two bugs in the database about how lilo isn't sizing
memory properly when it loads ramdisks. This appears to affect a
certain class of machine. I don't have a machine with < 64 MB of
memory, so I cannot test it directly. I can tell that the latest LILO
includes a new codepath that detects machines with more than 64MB of
memory and puts the ramdisk at that boundary. One user reported that
his k6-2 wouldn't boot at all, but it isn't clear that his problem is
with ramdisks since he didn't state it as such. He did claim that one
of the interrupt calls used in LILO returns an incorrect memory limit.
Has anyone on this list encountered this problem?
I'm thinking that one solution would be to disable this new memory
check and fallback to the older code that seems to work. Opinions?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com