Re: debian-installer status
Ethan Benson <email@example.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 06:50:42PM -0700, Rob Bos wrote:
> > > - /dev is 3k bigger
> > How practical would it be to compile devfs and include devfsd in the
> > bootfloppies?
> the real installed system should not use devfs nor require it.
Why not? There are only advantages, so where do you see the problem?
Everything that is possible to do with the old system is also possible with
devfs, but devfs has some nice new features like only showing you those
entries that really exists, no more need of that really braindead
device-numering system etc.
Until the next mail...,