Re: debian-installer status
Rob Bos wrote:
> > - /dev is 3k bigger
> How practical would it be to compile devfs and include devfsd in the
If it wasn't for that 33k binary plus config files, I'd say go for it,
but we can't afford to bloat more right now.
> on my system, devfsd is 33k, 15k after gzip. This would let b-f get rid of
> /dev/*, and could make for more reliable installation scripts (i.e, once
> you've inserted the module you can forget about whether there's a dev entry).
That is a good point indeed.
> I'm not sure if bootfloppies is using a 2.4 kernel, though. Probably not,
> considering the massive increase in size between 2.2 and 2.4.
d-i is ignoring 2.2 -- 2.4 all the way.
see shy jo