On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 07:51:33AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > Which only proves that the script ran and the daemon is running > needlessly. I agreed it's screwed up, but not that it fucked up your > network. My home network is static and my work is dhcp, I switch back > and forth regularly with dhcp-client managing not to cause problems. I > would expect that without a dhclient.conf (or whatever) that it doesn't > configure any interfaces. So, is your complaint substantive? Has > dhcp-client actually screwed up your static network (when it runs, that > is ;-)? Just curious. yes it has and does, see the bug report. if the network is statically configured dhcp should /not/ run. why is this so difficult? its much faster to just fix the fscking bug rather then argue stupid excuses not to fix it. -- Ethan Benson beginning to think i should stop wasting my time on this project http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpnLQA7KFCpJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature