[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: successful installation with 2.3.5 boot-floppies



On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:37:21PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Anthony, I sense some impatience and/or hostility here.  What is it
> we can do to make you more happy?  

(For reference, most of the hostility is primarily due to non-Debian
related computer problems; the best thing you can do is either ignore it,
or kick me when I misapply my irritation. Further said non-Debian related
computer problems mean I haven't had time to look at much b-f's related
stuff recently. Next step is to see if we can get some CD images available
somewhere, along with any instructions that people might need to do installs
based on them. CD installs will be horrible atm: there's the b-f alpha-ness,
combined with probable problems with apt-cdrom, and who knows what else.
Still, at this point, that's fine, we're just trying to demonstrate that we
can do installs right now.)

(An additional problem is that the auric's recent problems (not master's,
this is a whole new set from the last 24 hours or so) have screwed up both
testing and the pool in general to an unknown degree. Depending on the state
of your mirror, this may or may not be a problem. More news as it comes to
hand.)

Cheers,
(aj)

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
  do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
                      -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)

Attachment: pgpl4bRBAW4KW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: