[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#96906: marked as done (Base-install over net doesnt load lilo)



Your message dated 12 May 2001 13:18:04 -0400
with message-id <oa7kzm5vw3.fsf@arroz.fake>
and subject line Bug#96906: Base-install over net doesnt load lilo
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2001 21:44:52 +0000
>From Bucky0@aol.com Wed May 09 16:44:52 2001
Return-path: <Bucky0@aol.com>
Received: from imo-d01.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.33] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14xblM-0001qH-00; Wed, 09 May 2001 16:44:52 -0500
Received: from Bucky0@aol.com
	by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.10.) id l.cc.14a805aa (15700)
	 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 17:44:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from  web29.aolmail.aol.com (web29.aolmail.aol.com [205.188.222.5]) by air-id05.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.37) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2001 17:44:15 -0400
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 17:44:15 EDT
From: Bucky0@aol.com
Subject: Base-install over net doesnt load lilo
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
Message-ID: <[🔎] cc.14a805aa.282b142f@aol.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: Boot-Floppies
Version: 1.9

When installing the base system over the network, it doesnt install lilo. I noticed this when, at the last step, I couldnt make a boot floppy or a bootloader. I opened a console and tried to do it manually, and it sayed that I had to run the version installed in the target install. I did a find '/target -name lilo' and there were no matches.

I reinstalled and I watched the network-install log, and it didnt appear to install lilo. I think that's an error.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 96906-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2001 17:17:56 +0000
>From adam@onshore.com Sat May 12 12:17:56 2001
Return-path: <adam@onshore.com>
Received: from arroz.onshored.com [216.220.101.2] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14yd1f-0001bA-00; Sat, 12 May 2001 12:17:55 -0500
Received: from arroz.fake (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arroz.onshored.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B24FC93802; Sat, 12 May 2001 13:18:04 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: apharris@burrito.onshore.com
To: Bucky0@aol.com
Cc: 96906-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#96906: Base-install over net doesnt load lilo
References: <[🔎] cc.14a805aa.282b142f@aol.com>
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 12 May 2001 13:18:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] cc.14a805aa.282b142f@aol.com>
Message-ID: <oa7kzm5vw3.fsf@arroz.fake>
Lines: 27
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 96906-done@bugs.debian.org

Bucky0@aol.com writes:

> Package: Boot-Floppies
> Version: 1.9

This is not an actual version.  We need to know the actual version of
boot-floppies you used.  On i386, it shows that on the syslinux screen
you get with the "boot:" prompt.

> When installing the base system over the network, it doesnt install
> lilo.

Yes, it does.  It installs base2_2.tgz and that has lilo on it.

> I noticed this when, at the last step, I couldnt make a boot
> floppy or a bootloader. I opened a console and tried to do it
> manually, and it sayed that I had to run the version installed in
> the target install. I did a find '/target -name lilo' and there were
> no matches.

I cannot reproduce this.  Nor can any of my friends.  We have done
many network installs.

Closing this bug, it's very wrong.

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onshore.com.....<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>



Reply to: