Re: &mdash in boot-floppies/documentation
On 20000927T162201-0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> I'll look into this. The HTML translation map in debiandoc-sgml maps &mdash to &mdash
> which according to the HTML/XHTML book of O'Reilly doesn't exist. Probably we need to
> use — but conformance is not guaranteed.
151's meaning depends on the charset. In latin-1 it appears to be
undefined (ie. dragons be there).
In HTML, there is no portable way to represent an em-dash - except by
using a plain old "-".
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % firstname.lastname@example.org % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%