Re: 2.2.13 okay for first cycle? (was Re: Packages installed today)
"Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 06:47:29PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > >The boot images for m68k for the Mac are kernel 2.2.12 which I report
> > > >the following on.
> The boot-floppies are 2.2.12, they use, for every m68k subarch, the kernel
> with the version 2.2.10. Or did you exchange the vmlinuz file and the
> modules?
> I havent received the updated kernel source yet, if we use a newer kernel
> version for mac, we have to use it for all other subarches as well, or
> somebody has to do some major work on the boot-floppies.
>
You are correct the boot-floppies are 2.2.12, but the actual kernel
version is 2.2.10 I made the mistake of thinking that the boot-floppies
version corresponeded to the kernel version. /proc/version reports the
following:
Linux version 2.2.10 (schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de) (gcc
version 2.7.2.3) #13 Sat Feb 5 15:56:35 CET 2000
Ray Knight
audilvr@speakeasy.org
Reply to: