Re: bogl
- To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: bogl
- From: Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <edmundo@rano.org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 11:47:01 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20000401114701.A905@rano.org>
- In-reply-to: <87vh25z6p1.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com>; from karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com on Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 03:40:10PM -0800
- References: <20000329151537.E28825@daisy.vocalis.com> <87vh25z6p1.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
Karl M. Hegbloom <karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com>:
> Edmund> Anyway, does anyone object to me commiting some of this stuff into
> Edmund> cvs.debian.org:/cvs/debian-boot, when I get it into a tidy state and
> Edmund> add some documentation? Is anyone else interested in it?
>
> Sounds Ok to me, though mine is not the final word. As long as you
> don't break anything, it should be a welcome addition to
> `boot-floppies'.
I didn't see any objections, so I've gone and committed some changes
in utilities/bogl/.
I've changed struct bogl_font to permit large fonts. This shouldn't
have any visible effect on the current test programs, which should
work as before. If anyone has tried them recently, I'd be grateful if
they could cvs update and try them again to make sure I haven't broken
anything.
I already have a "bterm" prototype that works fairly well (I ran mutt
in it and read some e-mail in Chinese), so I'll add that to CVS next.
Obviously, don't let this distract from getting potato ready ...
Edmund
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: bogl
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>