Bug#60370: marked as done ([fixed in CVS] libdb2 missing from base?)
Your message dated 31 Mar 2000 11:53:36 -0500
with message-id <email@example.com>
and subject line bugs close in boot-floppies 2.2.9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2000 16:32:09 +0000
Received: (qmail 5273 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2000 16:32:08 -0000
Received: from gate.westel900.hu (188.8.131.52)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2000 16:32:08 -0000
Date: 14 Mar 2000 17:29:17 +0100
From: "János Holányi" <HOLANYIJ@westel900.hu>
Subject: libdb2 missing from base?
X-Orcl-Application: InterOffice Version184.108.40.206.20
X-Mailer: Oracle InterOffice (version 220.127.116.11.40)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Version: 2.2 (potato)
At the first run of apt-get right after the installation of base, I get
# apt-get install joe
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
perl-5.005-base: PreDepends: libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7) but it is not going to
E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify
Of course, 'apt-get -f install' corrected the problem by downloading and
installing libdb2, but why not ship base with libdb2 included?
Maybe an automatic run of 'apt-get -f install' would be a good idea instead
of including it in base, if the reason for not including it was its big
BTW, I bypassed dselect (which I personally strongly dislike to use) at the
How I work is that I always want to get to the root prompt ASAP after the
installation of base and operate every further installations with apt-get.
In this case I didn't get a clean situation, and that is why I find it a bug.
Received: (at 60370-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2000 15:56:29 +0000
Received: (qmail 9051 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2000 15:56:27 -0000
Received: from 216-164-253-135.s135.tnt6.nyw.ny.dialup.rcn.com (HELO arroz.fake) (@18.104.22.168)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2000 15:56:27 -0000
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 0369D93857; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:53:36 -0500 (EST)
To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
Subject: bugs close in boot-floppies 2.2.9
From: Adam Di Carlo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 31 Mar 2000 11:53:36 -0500
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
We believe that the bug you reported has been fixed in the potato
boot-floppies, version 2.2.9 or higher.
Thank you for your bug report.
We encourage you to test the potato boot-floppies on your system. If
your problem persists, please either respond to debian-boot and CC
your original bug and we will reopen the bug, or else submit a new bug
against the boot-floppies package.
Many problems are cause by other packages from Potato, such as
makedev, modconf, etc. Bugs against those should be filed against
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>