[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#60371: marked as done ([fixed in CVS] base, installation glitches (configure network, start new system))



Your message dated 31 Mar 2000 11:53:36 -0500
with message-id <oa1z4r13ov.fsf@arroz.fake>
and subject line bugs close in boot-floppies 2.2.9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2000 16:34:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 5814 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2000 16:34:28 -0000
Received: from finch-post-11.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.39)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2000 16:34:28 -0000
Received: from aguazul.demon.co.uk ([158.152.135.59])
	by finch-post-11.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 12UuH4-000DhB-0B
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 16:34:26 +0000
Received: by aguazul.demon.co.uk
	id m12Utyw-0004L9C
	(Debian Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2); Tue, 14 Mar 2000 16:15:42 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 16:15:42 +0000
From: Jim Peters <jim@aguazul.demon.co.uk>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: base, installation glitches (configure network, start new system)
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20000314161542.B1612@aguazul.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i

Package: base
Version: 2.2.7-2000-02-13
Severity: grave

I have a network card, but I chose not to configure it during installation.
In the `Configure the Network' section, I enter my machine name, and at the
next step, it complains that no network interfaces were found, asking me if
I want to abort.  I don't want to, so I say NO, which results in the
splash-screen "Software in the Public Interest ... presents".  This is what
happens when it crashes out, yes ?

If I say "YES" instead, I just keep on getting that section come up as the
default.  I can do the later stages of installation by hand, but this is a
severe pain in the neck.

- - -

When I get to "Start new system", it reports:

  Could not setup init-chroot for starting the new system.  Try simply
  rebooting instead.

- - -

After rebooting, it prompted to scan in the CDROMs for APT.  After scanning
a CDROM it prompted to scan another YES NO.  It defaults to NO, but because
there are only two buttons, it is not obvious which one is highlighted,
unless you remember the colours from the other menus.  So I kept thinking it
was on YES, when it was on NO, and when I thought I said NO, it went and
scanned my CD-ROM again.  This confusion could be avoided by putting another
button on there, perhaps CANCEL (==NO).  Then it would be obvious which one
was highlighted (2 unhighlighted vs 1 highlighted).  I'm not an
unintelligent user.  If it fooled me, it will fool others.

Kernel is 2.2.14, libc-2.1.3.so (as installed by default).  Potato images
are snapshots from 6-Mar-2000.

Jim

-- 
 Jim Peters         /             __   |  \              Aguazul
                   /   /| /| )| /| / )||   \
 jim@aguazul.      \  (_|(_|(_|(_| )(_|I   /        www.aguazul.
  demon.co.uk       \    ._)     _/       /          demon.co.uk
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 60371-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2000 15:56:29 +0000
Received: (qmail 9051 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2000 15:56:27 -0000
Received: from 216-164-253-135.s135.tnt6.nyw.ny.dialup.rcn.com (HELO arroz.fake) (@216.164.253.135)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2000 15:56:27 -0000
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
	id 0369D93857; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:53:36 -0500 (EST)
Sender: apharris@arroz.fake
To: 57001-done@bugs.debian.org, 57106-done@bugs.debian.org,
	58266-done@bugs.debian.org, 58387-done@bugs.debian.org,
	58638-done@bugs.debian.org, 58641-done@bugs.debian.org,
	59182-done@bugs.debian.org, 59256-done@bugs.debian.org,
	59329-done@bugs.debian.org, 59358-done@bugs.debian.org,
	59747-done@bugs.debian.org, 59936-done@bugs.debian.org,
	60179-done@bugs.debian.org, 60218-done@bugs.debian.org,
	60306-done@bugs.debian.org, 60370-done@bugs.debian.org,
	60371-done@bugs.debian.org, 60679-done@bugs.debian.org,
	60758-done@bugs.debian.org, 60783-done@bugs.debian.org,
	60924-done@bugs.debian.org, 60956-done@bugs.debian.org,
	61229-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject:  bugs close in boot-floppies 2.2.9
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 31 Mar 2000 11:53:36 -0500
Message-ID: <oa1z4r13ov.fsf@arroz.fake>
Lines: 18
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


We believe that the bug you reported has been fixed in the potato
boot-floppies, version 2.2.9 or higher.

Thank you for your bug report.

We encourage you to test the potato boot-floppies on your system.  If
your problem persists, please either respond to debian-boot and CC
your original bug and we will reopen the bug, or else submit a new bug
against the boot-floppies package.

Many problems are cause by other packages from Potato, such as
makedev, modconf, etc.  Bugs against those should be filed against
those packages.


-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


Reply to: